Single post

Das the new economic nationalism

Das the new eco바카라nomic nationalism.

But this new nationalism will be much weaker than ever before.

There are two reasons. First, the nationalist movement is being led by the new political party, the far-left. Thjarvees.comis party is going to be the force behind the new economic nationalism. The far-left’s policies on foreign trade, on workers’ rights, on social security, on foreign aid will be the guiding principles. And the economic nationalism will aim not only at foreign markets but, more important, at the US consumer market. It will also우리카지노 aim at keeping China from becoming a second-rate economy, even by western standards, by making it appear inferior and worse off.

The second reason is the enormous impact this new economic nationalism will have on the Democratic Party. For the Democratic Party will lose. It will be reduced to a party of Wall Street Wall Street, or the Republicans for short, a party of big corporate executives, of Wall Street, and the very rich, Wall Street bankers, who do not want anything to do with the government; these three elements together make up much of the Democratic Party. In other words, their whole political philosophy will be dictated by the influence of the big banks, by the financial interests of the financial services industry; their campaign plan will be based on lowering wages and raising prices; they will seek to cut workers’ benefits, limit consumer choices, and promote welfare spending. This is the legacy of FDR.

Third, and most significantly, I think the new economic nationalism will lead to a radical change in the relationship between the Democratic Party and working people. At the heart of the modern Democratic Party, and the Democratic leadership, is the financial industry, which has not only dominated the Democratic Party but has also been very effective at keeping workers at bay. It used the Democrats to do its bidding by taking over their party and their parties in the ’60s and ’70s, and by continuing to do so by backing the Democrats from the ’90s on up.

The result was the destruction of the party that represented the interests of the vast majority of the working class and the defeat of its political and organizational ability to fight back. What happened was, in many ways, worse than just the collapse of the Democratic Party, because the leadership of the Democratic Party now has a party, and the leadership has no political program, and its position is determined by the interest of corporate interests and by their desire for economic growth and welfare. The leaders of the Democratic Party have no idea of the profound change i